Old Goat

Joined

• started 43 topics
• posted 586 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Old Goat

• 
  28

  100% pure unadulterated speculation - what changes would a "New New World Tranlsation" contain?

  by sir82 in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  on this thread:.

  http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/257481/1/i-cant-find-any-bibles-seems-to-be-a-shortage.

  some (well, me, mostly) are speculating that the wts is planning to distribute a "new new world translation" some time soon.. if that is true, what changes do you think they would include?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  Better grammar would be nice. For a start, drop the reflexive pronouns.
• 
  29

  What's Your Opinion Of The Personalities Of The Governing Body?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i believe the gb has typically been an odd group of men.

  this new batch, the faithful and discreet slave seem very impressed with themselves....like they are modern day apostles or something....or maybe it's just me..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  self-appointed, self-anointed, sons of Eli.
• 
  7

  A Historian's Rant

  by Old Goat in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i almost always post about watch tower history, and if you've read my previous comments you know i follow the truth history blog.

  dr. de vienne posted a long, explosive rant based on a blog comment.

  along with it (someone really set her off!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  Dear Slimb,

  I emailed her and asked, since I have no easy answer. Here's what I got back:

  Dear ---.

  Now that’s an interesting question, and I can’t answer it. I don’t know why Literalists accepted the year-day theory. As a principle of prophetic interpretation, it goes back to the 4 th century. Russell knew this. We don’t know where he picked up that tidbit, but we know he came across the fact. Personally, (and it’s just a guess) I think he found it in a book entitled Prophetic History.

  Literalists accepted the idea. It was an Adventist who rejected it, though most of them accepted it too. I suppose they accepted it so easily because of the verse in Ezekiel that contains the phrase, “a day shall be for a year.” That gave them license to see it as a God-authorized concept.

  I’ll have to research that. Thanks for the interesting, puzzling question.

  R
• 
  7

  A Historian's Rant

  by Old Goat in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i almost always post about watch tower history, and if you've read my previous comments you know i follow the truth history blog.

  dr. de vienne posted a long, explosive rant based on a blog comment.

  along with it (someone really set her off!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  Schulz and de Vienne trace Russell's connections with One Faith belief. Ever heard of it? Me either ... until i started reading their work. One Faith emphasied the near return of christ, but to restore paradise to the earth. Sound familiar? They're the anticedent group behind the abrahamic faith and blessed hope congregations. And they weren't adventists at all. I've found and read some of their early material. It's a new concept to me, but I believe S and d V are right on this. I'm not sure what set her off. Some comment on one of the posts that I missed, I suppose.

  If you ask me, the creep factor falls more on Rutherford than Russell. But I have on open mind on that. I'm certain I wouldn't go to lunch with either.

  I've read all the Russell era Watch Towers. He wasn't a plagerizer within the meaning of that word. He was a cherry picker. In one of their posts on their invitation only blog Mr. Schulz calls him a "Cut and paste" bible student. That seems about right.
• 
  7

  A Historian's Rant

  by Old Goat in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i almost always post about watch tower history, and if you've read my previous comments you know i follow the truth history blog.

  dr. de vienne posted a long, explosive rant based on a blog comment.

  along with it (someone really set her off!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  I almost always post about watch tower history, and if you've read my previous comments you know I follow the truth history blog. Dr. de Vienne posted a long, explosive rant based on a blog comment. Along with it (Someone really set her off!) she's posted parts of their research you've not seen on the public blog. Give it a read. I'm interested in your thoughts too. I like this. She "calls a spade a spade" while making her points. You have no idea how much she reminds me of my youngest granddaughter.

  http://truthhistory.blogspot.com/
• 
  21

  Where did Pastor Russell get his TRUTH?

  by Terry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  most jehovah's witnesses are aware there once lived a man named russell and he had something to do with the early years of their religion.. but, generally, interest in the early days is almost non-existent.

  after all, nobody was running around calling themselves jehovah's witnesses, so what difference does any of that really make?.

  russell and the origins of jw doctrines are, as a result of this total black out of curiousity, hidden and permanently obscured.. in fact, the only time charles taze russell is discussed is because some expose' by an apostate has raised a stink.. admitedly, most anti-jw books seek to dredge up scandals, lawsuits, accusations and failed predictions swirling around russell's ministry.. in my own opinion, none of that is half as interesting as the missing part of the equation: where from did pastor russell get his truth?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  booze runs to canada are entirely possible. I don' t know that it happened, given the source for the claim. But it is certainly possible. I wonder how one would irrefutably prove that?
• 
  183

  Article: It's Time to Outlaw Extreme Shunning in Modern Society

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://gilmermirror.com/bookmark/23272594/article-extreme%20shunning#.ufwjurllscm.facebook.

  extreme shunningthe gilmer mirror.

  its time to outlaw extreme shunning in modern society by: richard e. kelly .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  Public awareness? Do you really think anyone but the tabloids, anti-sect people and fringies care what Jehovah's Witnesses do? Only people with a similar purpose will care. This is an oh hum issue for most outsiders. Isn't the best "cure" to move on? Or to stay marginally connected. I don't fault either decision.
• 
  183

  Article: It's Time to Outlaw Extreme Shunning in Modern Society

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://gilmermirror.com/bookmark/23272594/article-extreme%20shunning#.ufwjurllscm.facebook.

  extreme shunningthe gilmer mirror.

  its time to outlaw extreme shunning in modern society by: richard e. kelly .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  The courts will not see, and have not seen shunning, as torture. You have the same constitutional right of free association as the Witnesses do. You have the right to leave. They have the right to avoid you like the plague. While it is their religious doctrine, it is also an individual right. Each Witness makes their own decision on what ever basis they choose. You may not like it, but it is their right. There are two constitutional issues here: Freedom of Religious conscience; freedom of association.

  By ranting and complaining, you show everyone that it works. You are punished. Why give them the joy? There is always the return smack: "Dear Mom and Dad. You know I love you endlessly. But I cannot associate with you as long as you follow the path of sin. Unkindness to family members is a sin. I pray that you repent."

  Another issue is this: Some of the behaviors that lead to disfellowshiping among JW's are horrendous, nasty, nauseating. Who in their right mind would associate with someone like that? No every "case" deserves contiuned family contact. I feel that way about my brother, now long gone out of the "truth." Good judgement - not religion - tells me that any contact with him would be like stepping in vomit. And you want a law that says I must be kind to a man who is a sore on the butt of humanity?

  And how would such a law be enforced. Suppose a law forbids organized shunning. Do you think it won't continue? All one has to assert is their personal freedom of association. "But, your honor, I don't want to associate with my uncle. He's a sexual devient who [insert act here]. I don't want my children or myself subjected to his life choices."
• 
  183

  Article: It's Time to Outlaw Extreme Shunning in Modern Society

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://gilmermirror.com/bookmark/23272594/article-extreme%20shunning#.ufwjurllscm.facebook.

  extreme shunningthe gilmer mirror.

  its time to outlaw extreme shunning in modern society by: richard e. kelly .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  LongHair,

  The age of majority in most states is 18.
• 
  17

  Anyone threaten a lawsuit against elder committee that DF you.

  by jam in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you threaten the commmitee with a lawsuit, each of you.

  will hear from my lawyer if you df me today.

  all you have, every penny.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Old Goat

  Years ago I was on the other side of this. A disfellowshiped person threatened to sue. They got themselves a lawyer who wrote a strongly-worded letter. We turned it over to the Watch Tower Society's legal department. They wrote back to the hick lawyer sending him a huge pile of prior court decisions and essentially said, "Go ahead, sue. See what happens." They dropped the case. Implicit in this was the threat of court costs and lawyer fees being assessed against the complainant.

  Suing on this basis does not work. It is a waste of time. It amounts to a huge temper tantrum without any significant meaning.